The implications when offering percutaneous nephrostomy for the management of malignant obstructive uropathy secondary to urological malignancy: can we be more selective?

Background & Objectives: Percutaneous nephrostomy (PN) for malignant ureteric obstruction (MUO) is increasingly accessible with high success rates. However, it is not without associated risks and morbidity, impacting quality of life, while not improving overall survival. In two UK hospitals, we investigated the outcomes of undergoing PN for MUO, to inform future patient counselling and selection for this intervention. Methods: A retrospective audit of electronic records identified patients that received PN for bladder, and prostate cancer (PCa) between January 2015 and December 2018. Hospital 1 had a 24-h nephrostomy service, while Hospital 2 had a limited service; Group A: recurrent or treatment-resistant PCa, Group B: primary PCa, Group C: Bladder cancer. Results: A total of 261 patients (Hospital 1 = 186, Hospital 2 = 75), had PN insertion. Seventy-eight had prostate or bladder cancer. Group A n = 30, Group B n = 12, Group C n = 36. Median age = 79 [interquartile range (IQR) = 72-86]. Following PN insertion, 12-month mortality was significantly greater in Hospital 1 at 82%, versus 52% in Hospital 2 (p = 0.015). Median survival: Group A: 177 days (IQR = 80-266), Group B: 209 days (IQR = 77-352), Group C: 145 days (IQR = 97-362). There was no significant difference in same-admission mortality, although group A had the greatest same-admission mortality at 17%. A total of 69% of all patients received bilateral nephrostomies. Patients with bilateral versus unilateral PN had no difference in mortality or nadir creatinine. Conclusion: Most patients with malignant obstruction secondary to prostate or bladder cancer lived less than 12 months after PN insertion. When offering PN, careful consideration of disease prognosis should be made, and frank discussion of the implications of a life-long nephrostomy with patients and relatives.

Dropped abdominal pressure at void in women.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: "Dropped pabd at void" occurs when pabd decreases below the previous resting pressure during voiding time. We sought clinical factors associated with this phenomenon and evaluated whether its correction modifies the urodynamic diagnosis. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional study of non-neurological consecutive symptomatic women. The following definitions were used: "dropped pabd at void": decrease in pabd at Qmax ≥ 5 cmH2O; bladder outflow obstruction (BOO) (pdetQmax ≥ 25 cmH2O + Qmax ≤ 12 ml/s and female BOO index (pdetQmax - 2.2*Qmax) > 18; "low detrusor contraction strength": PIP1 (pdetQmax + Qmax) < 30. In patients with "dropped pabd at void", pdetQmax was corrected. RESULTS: A total of 360 women were analyzed. Ninety-five percent of the women had a variation in pabd at Qmax between -13 and 53 cmH2O. "Dropped pabd at void" was found in 100 women (27.8%). History of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery was significantly higher (p = 0.016) and symptoms of mixed urinary incontinence were significantly lower (p = 0.030) in patients with "dropped pabd at void". On multivariate analysis only the history of SUI surgery maintained its significance (OR = 1.787 [95% CI: 1.058, 3.017], p = 0.030). When correcting pdetQmax in women with "dropped pabd at void", 2 or 5 patients lost BOO diagnosis (depending on how it was diagnosed) and 7 patients gained a "low detrusor contraction strength" diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-quarter of women had "dropped pabd at void", which was associated with a history of SUI surgery. Correction of pdetQmax would lead to a 2.5% to 3.33% diagnostic modification.

[Penile prostheses: Description of a series of implants with and without dilatation of the corpora cavernosa]. / Prótesis penianas: descripción de una serie de implantes con y sin dilatación de cuerpos cavernosos.

INTRODUCTION: Penile prosthesis (PP) implantation is the treatment of choice for refractory erectile dysfunction (ED). They show a high satisfaction rate (75%-100%) and a complication rate that varies between 2.1% and 28.8%. The standard surgical technique includes dilatation of the corpora cavernosa (CC) prior to the insertion of the cylinders. This step takes time and is critical for the occurrence of complications. The aim of this study is to describe the results of a series of PP implanted using the techniques with and without dilatation of the CC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred and 20 patients with refractory ED in whom a PP was implanted by 2 surgeons in different centers. Comorbidities, operative characteristics, satisfaction and postoperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The average age was 61±9.6 years. The most prevalent comorbidities were: history of radical prostatectomy, high-blood pressure and diabetes mellitus. Forty-two malleable and 78 hydraulic prostheses were implanted. Eleven patients had a previous PP. The median operative time was 70minutes (35-140). The satisfaction reported was 95.8%. Ten patients presented complications. In the group in which the surgery was performed without dilatation of the CC (n=80), the operative time was shorter (62.5minutes [35-105] versus 90minutes [60-140] respectively, p<0.0001). There was no difference in complications (p=0.73) or levels of satisfaction (p=0.196) when comparing the technique with and without dilatation of the CC. CONCLUSION: In our series, a shorter operative time was observed with the technique without dilatation of the CC, but there were no differences in complications. A prospective and randomized study is required to make a stronger recommendation regarding to dilatation of the CC.

Comparación entre los efectos de la varicocelectomía microquirúrgica subinguinal bilateral vs la unilateral en los parámetros seminales / Comparison of the effects of unilateral vs bilateral microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy in seminal parameters

INTRODUCCIÓN: El varicocele es una causa frecuente de infertilidad en el hombre, encontrándose en el 40 por ciento de los hombres que consultan por infertilidad, existiendo diversas teorías que explican esta situación. Numerosos estudios apuntan a que la reparación del varicocele se asociaría a una mejoría en los parámetros seminales e incluso en las tasas de fertilidad. Entre las técnicas reparativas la varicocelectomía microquirúrgica (VM) se ha posicionado como la técnica gold standard dado sus mejores resultados en cuanto a éxito, recidiva y seguridad. OBJETIVO: evaluar el rol de la VM en los parámetros seminales de varones que consultan por infertilidad y que son sometidos a VM bilateral en comparación con aquellos en que se realiza VM unilateral. Materiales y método: se seleccionó a pacientes con varicocele clínico que consultaron por infertilidad y que tenían el espermiograma alterado, a los que se realizó VM uni o bilateral según tuvieran la enfermedad en uno o ambos lados. Se tomó el promedio de los parámetros seminales de 2 espermiogramas pre-operatorios y otras variables clínicas y demográficas y se comparó con los parámetros seminales a 6 meses post-cirugía. Además se comparó los resultados del grupo de VM bilateral con el unilateral. RESULTADOS: no hubo diferencias entre los grupos en el pre-operatorio, evidenciándose una mejoría en ambos grupos al analizar los resultados a los 6 meses post-VM. Esta mejoría fue significativamente mayor en el grupo de VM unilateral en cuanto a la concentración espermática (mediana de 6 mill/ml, comparado con 0.75 mill/ml en el grupo de pacientes sometidos a VM bilateral. p Value = 0.02)...

Introduction: Varicocele is a common cause of infertility in men, present in 40 percent of men with infertility, there are several theories that explain this situation. Numerous studies suggest that varicocele repair would be associated with an improvement in semen parameters and even fertility rates. Among the reparative techniques microsurgical varicocelectomy (VM) has positioned itself as the gold standard technique given the best results in terms of success, recurrence and security. Objective: To evaluate the role of the VM in semen parameters of men consulting for infertility and who undergo bilateral VM compared to those VM is performed unilaterally. Materials and Methods: We enrolled patients with clinical varicocele who consulted for infertility and had altered semen analysis, in which VM was performed unilateral or bilateral depending if they had the disease in one or both sides. The average of 2 pre-operative semen parameters was used and other clinical and demographic variables and they were compared with semen parameters at 6 months post-surgery. We also compared the results of the group with unilateral versus that with bilateral VM. Results: There were no differences between groups in the pre-operative, evidence-dose improvement in both groups in analyzing the results at 6 months post-VM. This improvement was significantly greater in the group of unilateral VM regarding sperm concentration (median of 6 mill / ml, compared with 0.75 million / ml in the group of patients undergoing bilateral VM. P Value = 0.02).Discussion: VM improves seminal parameters in patients with unilateral or bilateral varicocele, being unilateral VM group that benefits the most. This could be explained by a greater cumulative damage spermatogenesis in the case of bilateral varicocele. Randomized controlled prospective studies are needed, allowing to determine the real effect of unilateral vs. bilateral VM.